You are not alone. We’re here to help.
People across the country have learned that ordinary photos of their children, loved ones, or even themselves, were altered with xAI’s Grok into explicit images. If this happened to you, your child, or someone you care about, you can request a free, confidential case review to understand your legal options.
100% private. Quick review. No obligation.
Riley Burnett is helping lead national litigation against technology companies whose AI products allegedly failed to protect children from exploitation. We bring decades of experience holding the world’s largest corporations accountable.
We are speaking with everyday people and parents whose children’s photographs were fed into Grok and returned as sexualized or “undressed” images, then shared with classmates, posted online, or used to harass.
Often, all it took was a single photo from:
Constant worry about who has seen the images and where they might appear next.
Children avoid classmates, skip school, or ask to change schools entirely.
Images passed around group chats, Discord servers, and social media.
Withdrawing from friends, teams, and activities they once loved.
Fear that fabricated images will follow them into college and their careers.
Many children need counseling or therapy to cope with the violation.
Many people are unsure where the images came from, who has seen them, or whether they can ever be fully removed. No one should have to navigate this alone.
Government regulators and families are asking whether xAI released Grok’s image tools without the safeguards needed to protect children. Legal claims allege xAI may have:
“We have zero tolerance for the AI-based creation and dissemination of nonconsensual intimate images or of child sexual abuse material.”
Grok posts an apology for generating a sexualized image of two young girls, calling it a failure in safeguards.1
Regulators in the EU, France, India, Malaysia and the U.K. open inquiries into sexual deepfakes and child sexual abuse material made with Grok.2
The California Attorney General opens an investigation into xAI over undressed, sexual AI images of women and children.3
Three Tennessee teens file a proposed class action alleging Grok was used to make explicit images from their homecoming and yearbook photos.4
These cases seek accountability and compensation for people and families harmed by AI products released without reasonable protections.
You may be eligible if:
Not sure? Reach out anyway. Every situation is different, and a conversation costs you nothing.
If you or your child are in immediate danger, call 911. You can report child sexual abuse material to the NCMEC CyberTipline and request removal of images through NCMEC’s Take It Down service.
Every story is different. We begin by listening, answering your questions, and understanding your situation.
Our team works to preserve evidence, examine how the images were created, what AI platform was involved, and whether the technology lacked reasonable safeguards designed to prevent foreseeable misuse.
Drawing on decades of experience in national products liability litigation, we work with co-counsel, technical experts, and investigators to help hold technology companies legally responsible for the harm they are causing.
Our goal is to help you and your family seek justice and help establish the legal standards that will govern this technology for years to come.
Courts often allow minors to proceed using initials, sealed filings, or other confidentiality measures.
Speaking with us is free and does not obligate you to take any action.
You pay nothing unless we recover compensation for you.